The featured image (above) was a designer’s take on an Audi-brand iron, and though it’s no fair comparison, an object of such simple function deserves to be treated with dignity.Ĭonsidering the ease of use, reliability, and overall design I give it a 3/4. This led me to researching other iron concepts that are blending the boundary between appliance and furniture. ![]() On a personal note, I’d like to add that despite the level of “attractiveness” the designer aimed for in this product, it is–like a majority of clothing irons–tucked away neatly in my closet where no one can see it. Perhaps it is more developed in premium models, but it feels like the cheapest part of the object.ĭespite my naturally clumsy demeanor, I’ve never burned/steamed myself on the stainless steel soleplate, which is partially due to the 3-way automatic shutoff (triggered by placing the iron upright, or leaving it on for too long, etc.).Ĭontent Credit: Yanko Design | Jaehyuk Lin This is surprisingly effective for its size and insignificant appearance. The cable protected by a flexible, plastic sheath, connected to a 360-degree, pivoting ball-joint to keep the power cable out of the way. I understand that the mouth of the reservoir is designed to minimize leakage, but it is not apparent that this is the fill location. If you don’t have a funnel or spouted pouring cup, water gets everywhere. ![]() One of the greatest issues I have with this iron is how difficult it is to fill the reservoir with water for steaming and spraying. This just has to be understood through trial and error. The numeric, heat-level system on the dial may be a tad confusing, as they don’t relate to any standardized system. The numbers and graphics on the object are minimal and clear, allowing someone to pick up the iron and use immediately with no prior experience to it. The dial feels responsive when turned, which reassures me I’ve reached the desired setting. I have, however noticed where dials can prove to be a hinderance during use. The dial is rarely adjusted during use, and thus doesn’t need to be placed within a finger’s reach. The post-2013 versions of this model have two triggers for narrow and wide spray options, which is a simple improvement, better suited for smaller sections of fabric. I find it easy to depress the large, spray nozzle trigger while moving the ironing. The break in material from hard plastic to soft rubber indicates interaction points on the grip and dial. There’s something about the dynamism of shape, along with cohesive chamfering and flow that make this iron look modern, tangible, yet nothing too far off from the idyllic “iron” shape. All features are evident at first glance. It’s profile is smooth and the cutaways make for an easy grip, suggesting an intentional forward motion when pressing fabric. I’d like to start with the form of this iron. ![]() I am going to detail some thoughts as to why I believe this design is good, some of its shortcomings, and suggested improvements. Perhaps this is because I’m familiar with it, or maybe there is an inherently good design about it. I don’t know much about irons, but I can say that I like this one more than any others I’ve used. In beginning this journey of cataloging objects, I decided to start with something I use nearly every day: my simple, college standard iron for one by Black & Decker. ![]() Black & Decker F976 Quickpress Iron size: 7 x 12 x 5″ built: 2012
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |